Do you know about - Terrorism - The Left, the Right, and the Middle East
How Early Can U Get An Abortion! Again, for I know. Ready to share new things that are useful. You and your friends.It has often been said that "All forms of extremism are equally bad"; often by citizen who are extremists. Extremism, in itself, is not wrong. To fight for a just cause and to be uncompromising in that fight is the noblest thing a someone can do. citizen on the left, mislabeled as liberals, are uncompromising in their fight for unavoidable values yet they never refer to themselves, and are never referred to by anything else, as extremists.
What I said. It is not outcome that the actual about How Early Can U Get An Abortion. You check out this article for information on anyone need to know is How Early Can U Get An Abortion.How is Terrorism - The Left, the Right, and the Middle East
When citizen on the right start to make noise and air their dissatisfaction, words such as militia, Nazi, skinhead, redneck, racist and many others get routinely thrown around. When citizen on the left air their dissatisfaction, words such as activism and protest get used. Liberals are community organizers while citizen on the right are rude agitators. This double proper has never been more obvious than in the rehabilitation of citizen who are voicing their displeasure on the proposed healthcare debacle.
The double proper was obvious in early April when the agency of Homeland security issued a article warning that there might be an increase in domestic terror by "lone wolf" right-wing extremists, maybe with soldiery experience. There was no specific brain for this threat. Janet Napolitano issued a article from Homeland security that, according to Ralph Peters, "repeatedly warns of our soldiery vets being terrorists. She uses 'terrorist'. It warns about citizen who oppose illegal immigration as being terrorist threats, as citizen who may differ on right-to-life issues as terrorist threats."
Right wing radio has repeatedly been referred to as hate mongering and extremist. As a result, the Obama administration is actively trying to limit talk radio, disregarding the hate being peddled by citizen on Msnbc, the misinformation from Cbs, Nbc, Abc, the Ny Times... You get the idea. Would it ever occur to anything to wonder why conservatives flock to talk radio? Would it ever occur to the citizen on the left that the reason citizen seek out talk radio is because the conservative view is constantly being disparaged and maligned by the main stream media? citizen on the left, not the right, created right wing talk radio. They did this by their media malpractice. citizen in the Msm weren't doing their job and in true American and free market fashion, when there is an unfulfilled need, someone will come along and fill that need. Fox news and talk radio came along and filled a black hole in the media market.
It's much easier to refer to right wingers as Nazis and terrorists than to really listen or try to understand what conservatives are saying. Is this projection? Does the left look at the right and judge the right based on their (the left's) values? When conservative authors and scholars give speeches at universities, liberal groups have done all they can to shut them down. They have thrown pies at authors; they have confiscated conservative newspapers and have successfully shut down conservative speeches. Is that an example of their "tolerance"? When Janet Napolitano warns of right wing terrorism, is she thinking, or expecting that the right wing will act the way the left has acted for the last 45 years?
To really view the double standard, dream Al Gore development a speech on global warming. someone comes along after the speech and says "Mr. Gore should be faithful in his rhetoric. There might be someone else Unabomber out there who may take what he says too literally." Don't hold your breath waiting for that scenario to happen.
It would seem ridiculous to imply that this one crazed environmentalist (The Unabomber, not Gore) should be compared with everybody who is an environmentalist. Yet that invidious comparison is constantly used by citizen on the left. How often does the name Timothy McVeigh come up when liberals are talking about Conservatives? To the left, all citizen on the right are inherent terrorists. For citizen who supposedly pride themselves on their insight of other people, cultures and faiths, they are remarkably ignorant and intolerant of anything with a dissimilar worldview than theirs.
While labeling citizen on the right as inherent terrorists (or as Nancy Pelosi said about citizen attending town hall meetings, "People with swastikas on their arms"), liberals are eager to look at the causes of Islamic terrorism. Liberals want to know the reasons that would cause a group to do such horrific things. Moral equivalence rears its ugly head and liberals reach for the quote at the starting of this article; "All forms of extremism are equally bad."
First of all, when I take my belt and shoes off to go through the concluding in the airport, I'm not doing it because of Christian fundamentalists or Zionists. There is one group that has caused this to happen. We can't live in a world where we have to pretend that the Emperor is wearing clothes when we can naturally see he's wearing nothing but a pair of striped boxer shorts. Saying that "all forms of extremism are bad" is one of the most idiotic comments that have come into the contemporary lexicon (well that and "at the end of the day...").
Some forms of extremism are noble and some aren't. Tasteless sense can always be used to tell which is which. The ones who tell 12 year old children to wear suicide belts can be described as the crazy extremists. The ones who fight against that ideology can be described as the noble extremists. It's really not that difficult. Yet when liberals try to excuse Islamic terrorism, they'll often play the Timothy McVeigh card again. "Well, there are citizen who bomb abortion clinics and what about Timothy McVeigh?"
The fact that Timothy McVeigh has to be mentioned so often, really indicates that there is not the epidemic of homegrown right wing terrorism that the left tries to display every time there is a controversial issue. Abortion bombings aren't cheered by conservatives and they are very rare. Though when one happens, the Msm will play it up with news coverage that can only be rivaled when a child accidentally shoots someone.
Middle Eastern, Islamic fundamentalist terrorism is clearly the biggest threat the country and the world has faced and will face in the future. The left draws a moral equivalency between the tens of thousands killed all over the world from Islamic terrorism, and the few citizen who have died from home grown terrorism. Of course, one person's death is one too many but no one on the right said, "We need to understand Timothy McVeigh." Home grown terrorism, as an issue, has been misrepresented. The image one gets when faced with the term "homegrown terrorism" is one of right wing militia groups, Nazis and skin heads.
Two of the biggest and most organized terrorist organizations in the United States are the Earth Liberation Front (Elf) and the Animal Liberation Front (Alf). The Fbi considers them two of the most dangerous home grown terrorist organizations. The Earth Liberation Front, along with its sister group, the Animal Liberation Front (Alf), have taken responsibility for more than 600 crimes since 1996, totaling more than 0 million in damages. The Earth Liberation Front sprung from -- and in many ways is still an arm of -- Earth First! As described on their own website: Earth First! (Ef!) is a "warrior society" that takes a "by any means necessary" arrival to "defending mum earth." The group declines to participate in the democratic process, preferring instead to damage, disable, and destroy the asset of its ever-growing list of enemies. Ef! targets include, but are by no means small to, loggers, ranchers, and farmers.
Where is the right wing home grown terrorist group that rivals that? There aren't any but no one would know it by listening to the Msm. Of policy it doesn't stop there. There are the Faln terrorists (Fuerzas Armadas de Liberación Nacional), responsible for more than 120 bomb attacks on United States targets between 1974 and 1983. Not only did this group commit these horrific attacks, but the current Attorney normal and Secretary of State were instrumental in the pardons of some of their members! Can you dream a Republican pardoning of abortion bombers?
There has been the Weather Underground, the Black Panthers, the Symbionese Liberation Army, and many more. The current president is an connect (some would say good friend) of two of the founding members of the Weather Underground, William Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn. Some of the biggest worldwide terrorist groups that are not home grown, but still pose a threat to the Us and its interests, such as Farc, are left Marxist groups. There just aren't the ultimate right wing groups that the left mythologizes about.
Liberals talk about "all forms of extremism" being bad, while associating, endorsing, pardoning and excusing some of the most ultimate groups ever created. Memo to the left; Please stop calling other citizen hypocrites.
I hope you obtain new knowledge about How Early Can U Get An Abortion. Where you may offer use within your everyday life. And above all, your reaction is How Early Can U Get An Abortion.Read more.. Terrorism - The Left, the Right, and the Middle East. View Related articles related to How Early Can U Get An Abortion. I Roll below. I even have counseled my friends to help share the Facebook Twitter Like Tweet. Can you share Terrorism - The Left, the Right, and the Middle East.
No comments:
Post a Comment